Haar Pflege Forum - Kostenlosen Informationen und Erfahrungsaustausch zu: Haarausfall, Haarwachtum, Haarnahrung und Haarpflege - Mit vielen Tipps und Tricks zum Thema haare |
|
|
Got a question on rule clarification, comments on rule enforcements or some memorable NHL stories? Kerry wants to answer your emails at cmonref@tsn.ca. Hey Kerry, Real simple one for you. How did Luke Glendening get called for goalie interference when he appeared to not even touch Braden Holtby who fell on his own? Thanks, Confused Wings Fan Kerry, Watching the Red Wings and Caps game - why was the good goal scored by Detroit in the first period disallowed? Is this not subject to review? Ref clearly did not see what happened on play or he would not have waived off goal. If he wasnt sure why not go to video review? Isnt the goal of the ref to get it right? Could he not have allowed the goal (because he clearly did not see what happened) and go to video review to confirm? E. Parsons Dear Fan and E., You werent the only confused fans when this potential game-changing decision was made by trailing referee Ghislain Hebert to disallow Drew Millers legitimate goal. Instead of the Wings being credited with scoring the first goal of the game they went on the penalty kill when a phantom goalkeeper interference penalty was assessed to Luke Glendening. There is no way to sugar-coat this blown call. Im certain the referee would be the first to admit the play did not happen the way that he thought it did from his position in the neutral zone. There is no value in beating him up over it as mistakes happen. What I want to focus our attention on is the breakdown in the two-referee system that took place in hopes it wont happen again; along with options that might have been available to alter this decision on the ice. Video review is presently unable to provide information or confirmation to referees on penalty infractions so there was no option for them to get involved on this play once the penalty was assessed. Each referee is primarily responsible for areas of coverage dependent upon where the puck is located in respect to their position on the ice. Simply put, the terms action (on and around the puck) and non-action divide these responsibilities and continuously shift between each referee as play transitions to avoid gaps in coverage. Once Braden Holtby vacated his goal crease to play the puck behind the net, end zone referee Mike Leggo was responsible for the action on and around the puck. It was his job to ensure there was no foul committed by Glendening as he pursued the puck. Holtby reversed the puck away from Glendening to teammate Matt Niskanen in the opposite corner to where Leggo was positioned. The referee should have moved off the side boards toward the action in the corner where an aggressive Wings forecheck forced a turnover. From this more ideal vantage point, the end zone referee could have seen that Holtby was untouched by Glendening in addition to viewing the action in the corner. Instead, the referee enters the camera frame off the wall late to wave off a goal having heard his partners whistle blow an instant prior to the puck entering the net. So how could this have altered the decision by the referee in the neutral zone, you might ask? Had it been me on the goal line that clearly observed Holtby trip on his own I would immediately convene a conference with the crew of officials. Hopefully one or both of the linesmen observed the play accurately, but even if they did not I would provide the necessary information to present considerable doubt in the mind of my partner to negate his initial penalty call. With no penalty on the play we would still have to face the problem of his whistle blowing prior to the puck entering the net. By virtue of this whistle, play was officially stopped and therefore the goal could not be allowed under the rules from the ice. This is a time when the whistle would be hard to swallow because the sound did not cause Holtby to stop or affect his ability to defend against the shot into the open net. Even though it would appear morally right to allow the goal, the fact that play had been stopped could not be disregarded on the ice. At this juncture, if no penalty was to be assessed, perhaps the expanded responsibilities granted to Video Review this season in rule 38.4 (viii) could be implemented to make the right call? It states that: The video review process shall be permitted to assist the Referees in determining the legitimacy of all potential goals (e.g. to ensure they are good hockey goals)...This would also include situations whereby the Referee stops play or is in the process of stopping the play because he has lost sight of the puck and it is subsequently determined by video review that the puck crosses (or has crossed) the goal line and enters the net as the culmination of a continuous player where the result was unaffected by the whistle (i.e., the timing of the whistle was irrelevant to the puck entering the net as the end of a continuous play.) One or three of the other officials on the ice should have observed this play accurately and informed referee Hebert of the error of his decision to justly negate a penalty call and perhaps allow Video Review to get involved. If that had been the case the timing of the whistle was irrelevant to the puck entering the net as a result of the continuous play executed by Drew Miller and the right and just decision could be rendered on this good hockey goal. I provide these potential remedies on this play in the absence of a Coaches Challenge that is much needed. Buy Air Max 90 Essential . Josh Mazzola drove in five runs to lead the Goldeyes (20-12) past the Capitales 11-5 Friday night at Le Stade Municipal in Quebec City. Air Max 90 Mens Outlet . The 17-time Grand Slam champion, who lose three straight finals in Monte Carlo to Rafael Nadal from 2006-08, has not played in the tournament since 2011, when he lost to Jurgen Melzer in the quarterfinals. http://www.outletairmax90cheap.com/outle...-cheap.html.com) - Minnesota Vikings running back Adrian Peterson lost an appeal to have his indefinite suspension overturned, the NFL announced Friday. Undefeated x Air Max 90 Black Opti Yellow . CHAUNCEY BILLUPS (Pistons): Yes they got Josh Smith and Brandon Jennings in the off-season and Andre Drummond is a beast (teams are kicking themselves for passing on him - he rebounds and block shots every game - thats two more discernable and significant skills than most guys in his draft class), but dont for a second discount the impact of having a savvy veteran like Billups on your team. Wholesale Air Max 90 . MLB executive Joe Torre ruled on Tuesday nights game at Wrigley Field that was called after 4 1-2 innings. The Cubs were declared the winners by a 2-0 score. Now, it is instead a suspended game that will resume at 4:05 p.Gleneagles, Scotland - Justin Rose and Henrik Stenson won their second match of the day on Friday as they led the Europeans to a big afternoon and a 5-3 lead at the Ryder Cup. The Europeans trailed after the morning four-ball session, but won 3 1/2 points in the afternoon foursomes to grab a 2-point lead. Rose and Stenson won the 16th and 17th to earn a 2 & 1 win over Hunter Mahan and Zach Johnson in the second match of the afternoon at Gleneagles. Lee Westwood and Jamie Donaldson claimed a 2-up win in the opening match of the afternoon to tie the matches 2 1/2 - 2 1/2. Rose and Stenson then gave the Europeans the lead. Sergio Garcia and Rory McIlroy rallied to halve their match with Rickie Fowler and Jimmy Walker. That American tandem halved both their matches on day one. In the anchor match, Victor Dubuisson and Graeme McDowell toppled Keegan Bradley and Phil Mickelson, 3 & 2. That was the first loss at the Ryder Cup for Bradley and Mickelson, who had been 4-0 together dating to the 2012 Ryder Cup at Medinah. Rose and Stenson never trailed en route to winning their second match. Rose made a 10-footer for birdie and a 1-up lead at No. 1. The match remained there until the sixth when the Europeans birdied the par-3 to move 2-up. Johnson answered with a 5-foot birdie putt at seven and a par at the eighth by the Americans squared the match. After Johnson missed a birdie try at 11, Rose made his birdie as the Europeans regained a 1-up lead. Mahan came back with a 7-foot birdie putt on the 14th to square the match for a second time. However, Stenson converted a par effort at 15 again to go 1-up. Both teams birdied the par-5 16th, before the Americans coughed up the match at 17. Mahan raced his birdie try six feet by the hole. After Johnson missed the putt for par, Rose tapped in his short par attempt to win the match. Earlier in the day, Rose and Stenson beat Webb Simpson and Bubba Watson 5 & 4 in the morning four-ball session. In the firsst match of the afternoon, Furyk chipped to tap-in range and the Americans were conceded birdie and the win on the par-5 third.ddddddddddddAfter a pair of halves, Westwood drained a 10-foot birdie on No. 6 to square the match. The Europeans took the lead with a par at the seventh. Westwood rolled in a 15-footer for birdie on the 11th to extend their lead to 2-up. Furyk trimmed the deficit with a short birdie putt on 16. Kuchar had a chance to even the match at 17, but missed a 13-foot birdie chance. After a pair of poor chips by the Americans at the last, the Europeans were conceded birdie and the match, 2-up. All four players in that match had sat out the morning session. Fowler and Walker, who rallied for a halve in the morning four-ball session, lost a late lead in this match against Garcia and McIlroy. Garcia and McIlroy took the early lead with a par at the third. A bogey on No. 5 was enough for the Americans to square the match after Garcia hooked his drive out of bounds. The Europeans came right back with a birdie on the sixth, but McIlroy missed a par attempt on the seventh and the match was all square once again. It remained that way until the 11th. Fowler made a 3-footer for birdie there and he made a 6-foot birdie try at the 12th to move 2-up. The Europeans got one back with a par on the 13th, but the Americans took the 15th with a par and they were 2-up with three holes to play. After both teams birdied the par-5 16th, McIlroy poured in a 40-footer for birdie to get within 1-down. Fowlers second landed in a deep greenside bunker, while Garcia found the back of the green from the right rough. Walker blasted to 17 feet before McIlroy rolled his eagle try to tap-in range. Fowler had a chance to match, but his birdie try came up short and left as the Europeans rallied for a halve. McIlroy and Garcia, the first and third ranked players in the world, had been in jeopardy of being shutout on day one, but rallied for a 1/2 point. ' ' '
|
Forum Statistiken
Das Forum hat 2723
Themen
und
3298
Beiträge.
Heute waren 0 Mitglieder Online: |
Einfach ein eigenes Xobor Forum erstellen |